Sanae Takaichi, Japan’s inaugural female prime minister, is navigating a diplomatic crisis as friction between Tokyo and Beijing intensifies regarding Taiwan. What commenced as a reserved exchange of greetings has rapidly escalated into one of the most acute standoffs between the two Asian nations in recent memory.
Escalating friction between Tokyo and Beijing
Just a month into her tenure, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi is embroiled in a significant global disagreement. Merely days following her meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping, the relationship between Japan and China has sharply declined, exacerbated by strong language and nationalistic passion. The immediate origin of this discord arises from Takaichi’s statements concerning Taiwan, which Beijing considers a fundamental national concern and an integral component of its land.
During a legislative assembly on November 7, Takaichi declared that any potential Chinese aggression against Taiwan—situated a brief distance from Japanese territory—would be regarded as “a situation jeopardizing Japan’s existence.” Her remarks indicated that such an occurrence might trigger a defensive military reaction from Tokyo. This change represented a significant deviation from earlier Japanese governments, which had historically refrained from suggesting direct military participation in Taiwan’s protection.
Beijing responded with outrage, condemning Takaichi’s comments as a serious intrusion into China’s domestic matters. The reaction extended beyond mere diplomatic declarations. Xue Jian, China’s consul general in Osaka, posted on X (previously Twitter), stating, “The protruding dirty neck must be severed.” Tokyo criticized the swiftly removed post as “utterly unsuitable,” while Taiwan characterized it as an overt menace.
China’s Foreign Ministry defended Xue, asserting that his comments reflected a reaction to Japan’s “dangerous and erroneous” statements. Officials accused Tokyo of undermining China’s sovereignty and warned that the issue of Taiwan remains a non-negotiable red line.
Echoes of “wolf warrior” diplomacy
The episode has revived memories of China’s so-called “wolf warrior” diplomacy—a combative foreign policy style that gained prominence in the early 2020s. At the time, Chinese diplomats often used social media to confront critics head-on, sometimes in inflammatory terms. Although Beijing had sought in recent years to soften this approach to rebuild trust with Western nations, the latest confrontation indicates a possible return to that aggressive posture.
Within China, nationalist sentiment and state-controlled media have intensified public indignation towards Japan. The People’s Daily, the primary publication of the Communist Party, characterized Takaichi as “irresponsible” and cautioned that “overstepping the boundary on Taiwan will incur consequences.” An account linked to China’s state television ridiculed her, inquiring, “Has she been hit in the head by a donkey?” Concurrently, Hu Xijin, a notable pundit and former editor of the Global Times, further inflamed the discourse, stating that China’s “weapon for decapitating invaders has been honed” and implying Japan would face ruin if it meddled in the Taiwan Strait.
Takaichi has subsequently attempted to minimize the incident, explaining that her remarks were theoretical and not meant as a policy announcement. Nevertheless, her standing continues to be uncertain. Japan relies significantly on China, its primary trading partner, despite growing apprehension regarding Beijing’s military buildup in the East and South China Seas. Reconciling national security interests with economic reliance has emerged as one of Takaichi’s most formidable obstacles.
A nuanced diplomatic equilibrium
Takaichi’s approach reflects her long-standing conservative stance on national defense. A protégé of the late former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, she has advocated for a stronger military posture and closer cooperation with the United States and regional allies. Her administration’s early statements about Taiwan, coupled with her meeting with the island’s representatives during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, signaled a continuation of Japan’s gradual shift toward a more assertive foreign policy.
During her late October meeting with Xi Jinping in South Korea, Takaichi underscored the significance of a “strategic, mutually beneficial relationship.” Nevertheless, she also voiced apprehension regarding China’s military exercises close to contested islands in the East China Sea—a region both countries assert ownership over. That conversation, while appearing amicable at the time, hinted at the more profound discord now emerging.
The current diplomatic clash comes at a particularly sensitive moment. This year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II—a conflict that continues to shape Chinese and Japanese national identities. Beijing commemorated the event with a massive military parade, showcasing its armed forces and reaffirming its historical narrative of resistance against Japanese aggression.
In anticipation of the commemoration, Chinese authorities charged Japan with downplaying its wartime cruelties, concurrently, state-controlled media broadcast numerous films portraying the savagery of Japanese troops during the conflict, featuring reenactments of the Nanjing Massacre. The Japanese embassy in Beijing went so far as to recommend its nationals converse quietly in public, apprehensive of possible animosity amidst escalating nationalist sentiment.
History’s shadow over Taiwan
The deep-seated antagonism between these two countries predates the Second World War, being intricately linked to Taiwan’s own convoluted past. Having been a Japanese colony since its transfer from Imperial China in the late 1800s, Taiwan stayed under Japanese dominion until Tokyo’s surrender in 1945. Subsequently, the Nationalist government of China assumed authority over the island, only to withdraw there after their defeat by the Communists in the civil conflict of 1949.
Since that time, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has viewed Taiwan as a renegade territory slated for eventual reintegration. From Beijing’s standpoint, the end of World War II signified the island’s “emancipation” from Japanese rule—a story deeply embedded in the country’s political self-perception. Chinese authorities frequently reference this historical context to bolster their sovereignty assertions and legitimize their resistance to external interference in matters concerning Taiwan.
When questioned about Takaichi’s statements, Chen Binhua, spokesperson for China’s Taiwan Affairs Office, referenced this shared past, asserting that Japan bears “historical responsibility” for its colonial rule over Taiwan. He declared that China had “restored” the island 80 years ago and warned that any attempt to obstruct reunification would be met with firm resistance.
The uncertain path ahead
The current diplomatic crisis highlights the enduring volatility of East Asian geopolitics. Japan’s growing security cooperation with the United States and its increased defense spending have already drawn Beijing’s scrutiny. Now, under Takaichi’s leadership, Tokyo appears willing to adopt a more outspoken stance on regional security, particularly regarding Taiwan’s stability.
For China, this matter goes beyond simple diplomacy; it delves into the core of national identity and sovereign rights. Consequently, even the mere hypothetical mention of Japanese military participation in Taiwan is viewed as an outright act of provocation.
While both administrations might eventually aim to reduce friction, this event highlights the delicate equilibrium that persists between two of Asia’s most formidable countries. Every miscalculation carries the potential to rekindle past animosities that never completely vanished over time.
In this atmosphere of mistrust and historical resentment, every word carries weight. For Takaichi, whose tenure has barely begun, the challenge lies in navigating Japan’s role between deterrence and diplomacy—maintaining peace while standing firm on national interests. Whether she can achieve that balance without deepening the rift with China will likely define not only her leadership but also the trajectory of East Asian relations in the years to come.
